A Landmark Victory for Fair Pay: What the Dallas Cowboys Cheerleaders’ Journey Means for Workplace Equity

The recent, headline-grabbing news that the Dallas Cowboys Cheerleaders (DCC) have finally received a substantial pay increase marks a significant moment, not just for this iconic group, but for the broader fight for workplace equity across industries. This development, revealed in the Netflix documentary America’s Sweethearts, underscores the undeniable power of advocacy and highlights the evolving landscape of employment rights.

Known globally as “America’s Sweethearts,” the Dallas Cowboys Cheerleaders are synonymous with the NFL brand, bringing immense value to the Dallas Cowboys organization, a franchise valued at over $10 billion.¹ Yet, for decades, their compensation remained strikingly low, a stark contrast to their widespread recognition and the demanding nature of their work. This disparity sets the stage for a compelling narrative of a long struggle for fair wages.

This report will delve into the Dallas Cowboys Cheerleaders’ decades-long journey for equitable compensation, tracing the pivotal moments that led to their recent victory. It will then unpack the systemic issues of gender pay disparity and the complexities of employment classification that have historically impacted cheerleaders and many other workers. Finally, it will explore the potential for collective bargaining as a tool for change and offer crucial insights for both employees seeking justice and businesses striving for legal compliance and fair practices. The experiences of the Dallas Cowboys Cheerleaders exemplify the very challenges that many individuals face in the workplace, from wage disputes and discrimination based on sex to the intricate dance between employee rights and employer obligations. Understanding this case provides valuable lessons for all parties involved in the modern workforce.

From Sidelines to Settlements: The Dallas Cowboys Cheerleaders’ Decades-Long Fight for Fair Wages

The journey of the Dallas Cowboys Cheerleaders toward fair compensation is a testament to persistent advocacy, marked by significant legal battles and growing public awareness. Their story illustrates a profound shift in how cheerleading, once perceived as a mere privilege, is increasingly recognized as a demanding profession deserving of equitable pay.

Early Days and the “Honorary” Status

In their nascent years, the compensation for Dallas Cowboys Cheerleaders was astonishingly meager. Reports indicate that in their early history, DCC members were paid as little as $15 per game, a figure that only slightly increased to $35 in the 1980s.³ What is particularly revealing about this period is that many early cheerleaders themselves viewed the position as an “honorary” one, expressing genuine surprise at receiving any pay at all.³ This mindset, deeply ingrained in the culture surrounding professional cheerleading, significantly contributed to the undervaluation of their labor for decades, even as the NFL’s commercial success soared. The perception of cheerleading as a glamorous hobby rather than a rigorous job created a fertile ground for underpayment, allowing organizations to benefit immensely from their image and performances without adequately compensating the individuals providing that value.

The Groundbreaking Erica Wilkins Lawsuit (2018-2019)

A pivotal moment arrived in 2018 when former Dallas Cowboys Cheerleader Erica Wilkins filed a lawsuit against the team, alleging significant violations of the federal Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA).⁴ Wilkins claimed that she was not paid for all hours worked, was denied overtime pay for weeks exceeding 40 hours, and was sometimes paid a flat rate that resulted in her earning less than the federal minimum wage of $7.25 per hour.⁴ During her tenure from May 2014 to August 2017, she reported being paid only $8.00 per hour for practices, training, and filming, which translated to an annual income of approximately $4,700 after taxes.⁴ A striking aspect of Wilkins’ complaint was the direct comparison of her pay to that of the Dallas Cowboys’ male mascot, who she alleged earned $64,000 annually plus commission, thousands of dollars more than the cheerleaders.⁵ This comparison starkly highlighted potential sex-based pay discrimination. The lawsuit also brought to light the uncompensated costs cheerleaders bore for maintaining their appearance, including salon appointments and gym memberships, despite strict team requirements.⁵ The Wilkins lawsuit served as a watershed moment, compelling the Cowboys to address their pay practices and setting a significant precedent for other NFL cheerleading squads. It forced the issue of fair pay for cheerleaders into the legal spotlight, demonstrating how individual legal action can challenge deeply entrenched systemic issues.

The lawsuit was settled in 2019, resulting in a notable increase in compensation for the cheerleaders. Their hourly wage rose from $8 to $12, and their per-game pay doubled from $200 to $400.¹ This outcome illustrates how legal challenges, even when settled out of court, can act as powerful catalysts, not only securing direct compensation for plaintiffs but also prompting broader policy changes and pay adjustments within the organization. This legal pressure created a new baseline for the DCC, building a foundation for future advancements.

The Role of “America’s Sweethearts” and the Recent 400% Increase (2025)

The struggle for fair pay continued, culminating in a “life-changing” 400% pay increase for the DCC, announced on June 18, 2025, during the second season of the Netflix documentary series America’s Sweethearts.¹ This recent development highlights the growing influence of public awareness and collective advocacy in compelling large organizations to address long-standing pay inequities.

Jada McLean, a five-year veteran who helped lead the negotiations, explicitly stated that the existence and visibility of the Netflix series played a “big role” in securing these increases.⁶ The documentary brought the financial hardships of the cheerleaders – many working multiple jobs despite the Cowboys’ multi-billion-dollar valuation – to a global audience.³ This public exposure created significant pressure on the image-conscious Cowboys organization, demonstrating how media attention can accelerate or even instigate changes that might otherwise take much longer through purely legal channels.

While the Cowboys organization has not publicly confirmed the exact new pay rates ⁶, reports suggest that if the previous average annual salary was around $37,947 (a figure compared to a full-time Chick-fil-A worker), a 400% increase would elevate it to approximately $151,000.³ Veteran cheerleaders could now earn over $75 per hour.⁷ Despite this significant raise, it is important to note that benefits like health insurance are reportedly still not included in the new compensation structure.⁷ This indicates that while progress has been made, there are still crucial gaps in comprehensive compensation.

Other Lawsuits and Settlements

The DCC’s fight is not an isolated incident but part of a broader trend across the NFL. In 2022, the Cowboys also settled a separate $2.4 million claim with four cheerleaders who alleged the team’s public relations chief filmed them in the dressing room.¹ Beyond Dallas, numerous other NFL teams have faced and settled wage-and-hour lawsuits from their cheerleaders in recent years. These include the Oakland Raiders ($1.25 million in 2014), the Cincinnati Bengals ($250,000 in 2015), and the New York Jets ($324,000 in 2016).⁹ These lawsuits often alleged below-minimum wage pay, lack of compensation for practices and appearances, and uncompensated out-of-pocket expenses.¹⁰ In response to these systemic issues, California even passed a law in 2015 specifically requiring professional sports teams to pay cheerleaders minimum wage, overtime, and provide sick leave and workers’ compensation.⁹ These instances collectively demonstrate a pervasive issue within the NFL regarding cheerleader compensation and working conditions, reinforcing that the DCC’s experience is part of a larger, ongoing movement for fair treatment and proper classification of labor.

Table 1: Dallas Cowboys Cheerleaders Pay Milestones

Date/Period	Key Event/Status	Compensation Details
Early History (pre-2018)	“Honorary” status	$15-$35 per game 3
2014-2017 (Erica Wilkins’ tenure)	Pre-lawsuit pay	$8 per hour, $200 per game; ~$4,700 per year after taxes 4
2018	Wilkins Lawsuit filed	Allegations of FLSA violations, unpaid overtime, below minimum wage 4
2019	Post-Wilkins Settlement Pay	Hourly wage increased to $12, per-game pay to $400 1
2022	Reported Pay (NBC Boston)	$15-$20 per hour, $500 per match, ~$75,000 per year 6
June 18, 2025	Recent 400% Pay Increase (Netflix Doc)	400% increase; Veterans potentially over $75 per hour, estimated annual salary ~$151,000 6

Beyond the Pom-Poms: Unpacking Gender Pay Discrepancies in Professional Sports

The Dallas Cowboys Cheerleaders’ experience serves as a compelling case study to analyze the broader issue of gender pay disparity within professional sports, highlighting how underlying classifications and societal perceptions can perpetuate significant wage gaps.

The Stark Contrast: Cheerleaders vs. Players and Mascots

Despite being highly trained dancers and athletes who dedicate “hours and hours of hard physical labour” to their craft, the Dallas Cowboys Cheerleaders were historically paid a minuscule fraction compared to the male football players, who earn millions.¹¹ This disparity is particularly striking given that the Dallas Cowboys are consistently ranked as the most valuable professional sports team globally, with a valuation exceeding $10.1 billion.¹ The cheerleaders are not merely performers; they are acknowledged as “hugely profitable and key to the Dallas Cowboys brand and marketing strategy”.¹¹ Their contribution to the team’s image and revenue is undeniable, making the vast pay differential particularly perplexing.

The pay gap extended even to other non-player roles: the team’s male mascot was reported to earn $64,000 a year plus commission, thousands of dollars more than a cheerleader like Erica Wilkins, who made only about $4,700 after taxes.⁵ This comparison underscores a pervasive pattern of undervaluing work traditionally performed by women, especially when it is associated with “entertainment” or “glamour” rather than “sport” or “core business.” Across the NFL, mascots typically earn around $60,000 per year and waterboys $50,000-$60,000 per year, while the average NFL cheerleader historically made only about $22,500 per year.¹³ These figures illustrate a systemic gendered devaluation of labor within professional sports, where the compensation for overwhelmingly female roles pales in comparison to male-dominated positions, even those requiring less specialized skill or public visibility.

Legal Frameworks: The Equal Pay Act (EPA) and Title VII Protections

Federal statutes provide crucial legal tools to challenge and rectify gender-based pay discrimination. The Equal Pay Act of 1963 (EPA) prohibits sex-based wage discrimination, mandating that men and women in the same establishment be given equal pay for “substantially equal work.” This means jobs that require “substantially equal skill, effort, and responsibility under similar working conditions”.¹⁵ The Erica Wilkins lawsuit specifically invoked the EPA, arguing that the cheerleaders’ work required “equal skill, effort, and responsibility under similar working conditions as Defendant’s mascot”.⁴ The EPA covers all forms of pay, including salary, overtime, bonuses, and benefits, making it a comprehensive tool for addressing wage disparities.¹⁶

Complementing the EPA is Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, a broader anti-discrimination law that also makes it illegal to discriminate based on sex in pay and benefits.¹⁷ Unlike the EPA, Title VII does not require jobs to be “substantially equal” to prove sex discrimination in compensation.¹⁶ Therefore, an individual with an EPA claim may also have a claim under Title VII, providing multiple avenues for legal recourse.¹⁶ These laws are foundational for employees seeking redress and for employers striving to ensure compliance and equity in their compensation practices.

The “Independent Contractor” Conundrum: A Barrier to Fair Compensation

A significant factor contributing to the historical underpayment and lack of benefits for NFL cheerleaders is their classification as independent contractors rather than full-time employees.¹⁰ This classification often exempts them from federal labor protections, including minimum wage, overtime pay, health insurance, and workers’ compensation.¹⁹ The Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), which sets federal minimum wage and overtime requirements, explicitly does not apply to independent contractors.¹⁰ This creates a critical bottleneck for cheerleaders seeking fair treatment under the law.

The Department of Labor employs a multi-factor “economic reality” test to determine if a worker is truly an independent contractor or an employee. Key factors include: 1) the extent to which the work is an integral part of the employer’s business; 2) whether the worker’s managerial skills affect their opportunity for profit and loss; 3) the relative investments by the worker and the employer; 4) the worker’s skill and initiative; 5) the permanency of the relationship; and 6) the nature and degree of control by the employer.¹⁰ Lawsuits brought by cheerleaders consistently argue that, based on these factors, they should be classified as employees. Their work is integral to the team’s operations and brand, they have little control over their schedules or methods, and the relationship is often long-term and controlled by the team.⁵

The consistent classification of cheerleaders as independent contractors, despite working conditions that strongly suggest employee status, reveals a deliberate strategy by NFL teams to circumvent labor laws and minimize labor costs. This discrepancy between classification and actual working conditions suggests an intentional misclassification to suppress wages and avoid employer obligations, thereby shifting the financial burden and risk onto the workers. This classification issue is a central legal battleground in modern employment law, extending far beyond professional sports, and represents a significant barrier to fair compensation and benefits for many workers across various industries. While the EPA and Title VII offer legal recourse for pay discrimination, their effectiveness is often hampered by the initial hurdle of proving employee status, which employers actively fight to deny.

Table 2: Compensation Comparison: Dallas Cowboys Cheerleaders vs. Other NFL Roles

Role	Typical Annual Compensation/Rate (Historical)	Gender (Predominant)	Employment Status (Typical)	Unionized (Typical)
Dallas Cowboys Cheerleader (Pre-2025)	~$75,000/year (high end) 6	Female	Independent Contractor	No
Dallas Cowboys Cheerleader (Post-2025)	~$151,000/year (estimated) 7	Female	Independent Contractor	No
NFL Mascot	~$60,000/year 13	Male/Female	Employee	No (but higher pay)
NFL Waterboy	~$50,000-$60,000/year 13	Male	Employee	No (but higher pay)
NFL Referee	~$205,000/year 20	Male	Employee	Yes
NFL Player (minimum salary)	~$750,000/year 20	Male	Employee	Yes

The Power of Unity: Exploring Collective Bargaining for Cheerleaders

The Dallas Cowboys Cheerleaders’ recent success, while not a direct result of formal unionization, highlights the undeniable power of collective advocacy and raises important questions about the potential for collective bargaining within the professional cheerleading landscape.

Understanding the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) and Employee Rights

The National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) is the cornerstone of private sector labor law in the United States. It guarantees most private sector employees the fundamental right to organize, form, join, or assist a union, and to engage in collective bargaining through representatives of their own choosing.²¹ The NLRA also prohibits employers from interfering with, restraining, or coercing employees in the exercise of these collective bargaining rights. This includes actions like threatening job loss, reducing hours, changing shifts, or promising benefits to discourage union support.²¹

Crucially, the protections and rights afforded by the NLRA apply to “employees,” not independent contractors.²³ Therefore, for cheerleaders to formally unionize and fully leverage the power of collective bargaining, their legal classification as employees is a prerequisite. This distinction is the linchpin of labor rights for many workers. The ability to engage in collective bargaining, and thus secure comprehensive benefits and protections, hinges almost entirely on this legal classification. Until this classification is successfully challenged, the full scope of NLRA protections, including collective bargaining, remains out of reach, perpetuating a cycle of precarious employment.

Past Attempts and Challenges in Cheerleader Unionization

Currently, NFL cheerleaders are largely non-union.²⁰ This stands in stark contrast to other key NFL personnel: players, who are union members with a collectively bargained minimum salary of $750,000, and referees, who are also unionized with an average compensation of about $205,000.²⁰ This disparity in unionization directly correlates with the vast differences in compensation and benefits.

Despite the current non-union status, there is historical precedent for cheerleader unionization. The Buffalo Jills cheerleading squad successfully formed a union in 1995 after years of receiving little to no pay, demonstrating that unionization is indeed legally possible for cheerleaders.²³ This historical example provides a blueprint for how collective action can lead to formal organization.

However, the most significant hurdle for widespread unionization among NFL cheerleaders remains their classification as independent contractors.¹⁰ Teams often argue this classification to avoid employee benefits and collective bargaining obligations.¹⁰ While cheerleaders could potentially argue that the NFL itself is a “joint employer” alongside individual teams, it is generally considered unlikely that the NFL would be deemed a joint employer of every team’s cheerleaders on a league-wide basis.²³ This makes team-specific unionization a more probable and legally viable path. The National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) has recently grappled with defining “joint employer” standards, highlighting the complexity of this legal area and the ongoing legal battles surrounding worker classification.²¹

The Path Forward: Why Collective Action is Crucial

The long history of poor wages and difficult working conditions for professional cheerleaders has created a climate “ripe for unionization”.²³ The recent pay increase for the DCC, while not a direct result of formal unionization, underscores the undeniable power of collective advocacy. Jada McLean, a veteran cheerleader, explicitly led negotiations for the pay raise ⁶, demonstrating that unified voices can compel significant change. This success, driven by collective advocacy and amplified by media attention, shows that even without a formal union, collective action can compel employers to make significant concessions, potentially paving the way for future unionization efforts by demonstrating the tangible benefits of unified demands.

If cheerleaders were to successfully unionize, collective bargaining would enable them to negotiate for comprehensive benefits (like health insurance, which DCC still reportedly lack ⁷), improved working conditions, and guaranteed fair wages, rather than relying on individual lawsuits or public pressure alone.²² It provides a structured, legally protected mechanism for ongoing dialogue and dispute resolution with employers. The cheerleaders’ struggle with independent contractor classification and the pursuit of collective bargaining mirrors the challenges faced by many workers in the modern “gig economy” who lack traditional employee protections. Their journey serves as a high-profile case study for the broader implications of employment classification on worker rights, including the ability to unionize and secure fair wages and benefits.

Lessons Learned: Implications for Employers and Employees in Today’s Workforce

The Dallas Cowboys Cheerleaders’ journey offers invaluable lessons for both businesses striving for compliance and employees seeking fair treatment in any industry. Their story illustrates how legal compliance and public image are deeply interconnected, especially for high-profile entities. For organizations like the Cowboys, valued at over $10.1 billion ¹ with the DCC being “hugely profitable and key to the Dallas Cowboys brand and marketing strategy” ¹¹, the Netflix documentary ⁶ brought the cheerleaders’ low pay to a wide public audience, creating significant reputational pressure. The subsequent 400% raise ⁶ suggests that the organization recognized the negative impact of the public perception of unfairness on their valuable brand. This indicates that for businesses, particularly those with significant public visibility, ethical employment practices and legal compliance are directly tied to brand equity and consumer perception, making it a business imperative beyond mere legal obligation.

For Businesses: Ensuring Compliance and Fostering Fair Practices

To avoid costly legal liabilities and reputational damage, businesses should draw clear lessons from the DCC’s experience:

• Review Worker Classification Diligently: The DCC case underscores the critical importance of correctly classifying workers as employees or independent contractors. Businesses should regularly review their classifications using the Department of Labor’s “economic reality” test.¹⁰ Misclassification can lead to severe legal liabilities, including significant back wages, penalties, and costly class-action lawsuits.⁴ Proactive review can prevent future litigation and safeguard the company’s financial health and public standing.
• Conduct Proactive Pay Equity Audits: To avoid discrimination claims, businesses should conduct regular internal pay equity audits. This involves analyzing compensation across roles to identify and rectify any gender-based or other discriminatory wage disparities, aligning with the Equal Pay Act and Title VII.¹⁵ Employing objective, gender-neutral criteria (e.g., skill, effort, responsibility, working conditions) for job valuation, as suggested by the Pay Transparency Directive (PTD) principles, can be a useful framework for ensuring fairness.¹¹
• Ensure Transparent and Fair Compensation for All Work: All hours worked, including mandatory training, rehearsals, and appearances, must be properly compensated at or above minimum wage, with overtime paid where applicable.⁴ Transparency in compensation practices, where appropriate, can build trust and prevent disputes, fostering a more positive and productive work environment.
• Prioritize Employee Well-being and Engagement: Proactively addressing employee concerns regarding compensation, benefits (like health insurance, which the DCC still reportedly lack ⁷), and working conditions is paramount. Ignoring these issues can lead to costly litigation, negative public relations (as powerfully demonstrated by the Netflix documentary ⁶), and a decline in employee morale and productivity. Fostering a culture of fairness and open communication is not just ethical, but also a sound business strategy.

For Employees: Knowing Your Rights and Seeking Recourse

The DCC’s journey also offers empowering lessons for individuals navigating their own employment situations:

• Understand Your Employment Classification: Be informed about whether you are classified as an employee or an independent contractor. If your duties and the control exerted by your employer suggest you are an employee, but you are classified as an independent contractor, you may be entitled to minimum wage, overtime, and other benefits that have been unlawfully withheld.¹⁰ This understanding is the first step toward asserting your rights.
• Know Your Wage and Discrimination Rights: Familiarize yourself with federal laws like the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), the Equal Pay Act (EPA), and Title VII, which protect against wage theft, unpaid overtime, and discrimination based on sex or other protected characteristics in pay and benefits.⁴ Knowledge of these laws empowers you to identify potential violations.
• Document Everything Meticulously: Maintain detailed records of all hours worked, specific tasks performed, work-related expenses incurred, and any communications regarding your pay, benefits, or working conditions. This documentation is invaluable evidence should you need to pursue a legal claim, as seen in the Erica Wilkins lawsuit.⁴
• Recognize the Power of Collective Action: The DCC’s success, driven by collective advocacy ⁶, highlights that individuals can achieve more when they unite. Whether through formal unionization (if employee status is established under NLRA ²¹) or informal group efforts, collective voices can be powerful catalysts for change, demonstrating that the landscape of employee advocacy is evolving, with public platforms increasingly complementing and amplifying traditional legal avenues.
• Seek Expert Legal Counsel Promptly: If you suspect wage violations, discrimination, or misclassification, do not hesitate to consult with an employment law firm. Many employment laws have strict statutes of limitations (time limits) for filing claims ¹⁶, so prompt action is crucial to protect your rights and explore all available legal avenues.

Conclusion: The Ongoing Pursuit of Justice in the Workplace

The Dallas Cowboys Cheerleaders’ long-fought battle for fair pay and their recent landmark victory serve as a powerful and inspiring narrative in the ongoing pursuit of justice and equity in the workplace. Their story is a microcosm of broader challenges faced by countless workers, particularly concerning gender pay disparities and the complexities of employment classification. It underscores that persistent advocacy, whether through legal channels, collective action, or amplified public awareness, can indeed lead to significant and “life-changing” improvements in working conditions.

For employers, the DCC’s journey is a clear reminder of the imperative to proactively review and ensure fair, compliant, and transparent compensation practices. It highlights that failing to address wage issues can lead to escalating financial and reputational consequences, and that ethical employment practices are directly tied to brand equity. For employees, it is a testament to the power of knowing your rights, documenting your experiences, and seeking recourse when those rights are violated. As employment law continues to evolve, our firm remains committed to assisting both individuals in asserting their fundamental rights and businesses in navigating these intricate legal landscapes to foster workplaces that are truly fair, equitable, and just for all. The pursuit of workplace justice is an ongoing endeavor, and the Dallas Cowboys Cheerleaders have certainly danced a significant step forward.

Works cited

1. Dallas Cowboys cheerleaders say they’re getting a 400% increase in pay, accessed June 19, 2025, https://apnews.com/article/dallas-cowboys-cheerleaders-pay-raise-74e30766d62b7d91c4065df0991659f4
2. Dallas Cowboys cheerleaders say they’re getting a 400% increase in pay – WFMJ.com, accessed June 19, 2025, https://www.wfmj.com/story/52862399/dallas-cowboys-cheerleaders-say-theyre-getting-a-400-increase-in-pay
3. Inside the Shocking Salaries of the Dallas Cowboys Cheerleaders – Yahoo, accessed June 19, 2025, https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment/inside-shocking-salaries-dallas-cowboys-195700396.html
4. Wilkins v. Dallas Cowboys Football Club, Ltd. – 3:18-cv-01511-S – Class Action Lawsuits, accessed June 19, 2025, https://www.classaction.org/media/wilkins-v-dallas-cowboys-football-club-ltd.pdf
5. Dallas Cowboys Cheerleader Sues Team for Unfair Wages – The Carlson Law Firm, accessed June 19, 2025, https://www.carlsonattorneys.com/dallas-cowboys-cheerleader-sues/
6. How the Dallas Cowboys Cheerleaders Got a 400% Pay Raise – Time Magazine, accessed June 19, 2025, https://time.com/7295238/dallas-cowboys-cheerleaders-pay-raise/
7. This is how much the Dallas Cowboys Cheerleaders earn after 400% raise in 2025, accessed June 19, 2025, https://en.as.com/nfl/this-is-how-much-the-dallas-cowboys-cheerleaders-earn-after-400-raise-in-2024-n/
8. ‘America’s Sweethearts’ Dallas Cowboys cheerleaders get 400% raise before debut of Season 2 of Netflix show | The Independent, accessed June 19, 2025, https://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/dallas-cowboys-cheerleader-salary-raise-netflix-b2772378.html
9. Cheerleaders Accuse NFL of Antitrust Conspiracy – Courthouse News Service, accessed June 19, 2025, https://www.courthousenews.com/cheerleaders-accuse-nfl-of-antitrust-conspiracy/
10. An Explainer: NFL Cheerleader Lawsuits (Part 1) – OnLabor, accessed June 19, 2025, https://onlabor.org/an-explainer-nfl-cheerleader-lawsuits-part-1/
11. Dallas Cowboys Cheerleaders and equal pay: what the hit Netflix show tells us about – Littler, accessed June 19, 2025, https://littler.co.uk/insights/dallas-cowboys-cheerleaders-and-equal-pay-what-the-hit-netflix-show-tells-us-about/
12. Dallas Cowboys Cheerleaders and Equal Pay: What the Hit Netflix Show Tells UK Employers | Littler Mendelson P.C., accessed June 19, 2025, https://www.littler.com/publication-press/publication/dallas-cowboys-cheerleaders-and-equal-pay-what-hit-netflix-show-tells
13. Do NFL cheerleaders get paid? Here’s how much the average salary is – NBC Sports Boston, accessed June 19, 2025, https://www.nbcsportsboston.com/nfl/new-england-patriots/do-nfl-cheerleaders-get-paid-heres-how-much-the-average-salary-is/265895/
14. How Much Do NFL Cheerleaders Make? NFL Cheerleaders’ Payouts Revealed!, accessed June 19, 2025, https://theplayoffs.news/en/how-much-do-nfl-cheerleaders-make/
15. Equal Pay Act of 1963 | U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, accessed June 19, 2025, https://www.eeoc.gov/statutes/equal-pay-act-1963
16. Equal Pay/Compensation Discrimination | U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, accessed June 19, 2025, https://www.eeoc.gov/equal-paycompensation-discrimination
17. www.eeoc.gov, accessed June 19, 2025, https://www.eeoc.gov/equal-paycompensation-discrimination#:~:text=Equal%20Pay%2FCompensation%20and%20Sex,a%20claim%20under%20Title%20VII.
18. Pay Discrimination | U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, accessed June 19, 2025, https://www.eeoc.gov/youth/pay-discrimination
19. Dallas Cowboys Cheerleader Salary: Revealed and Analyzed [2025] – dbest.co, accessed June 19, 2025, https://www.dbest.co/how-much-is-the-salary-of-cowboys-cheerleader-in-dallas/
20. Have you been watching the football games? : r/union – Reddit, accessed June 19, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/union/comments/19854zk/have_you_been_watching_the_football_games/
21. Joint Employment and the National Labor Relations Act – Congress.gov, accessed June 19, 2025, https://www.congress.gov/crs-product/R47943
22. under the national labor relations act, accessed June 19, 2025, https://www.dol.gov/sites/dolgov/files/olms/regs/compliance/eo_posters/employeerightsposter11x17_2019final.pdf

Pom Poms and Picket Lines: Might Professional Cheerleaders Unionize? | Sports Litigation Alert, accessed June 19, 2025, https://sportslitigationalert.com/pom-poms-and-picket-lines-might-professional-cheerleaders-unionize/